Exception Anxiety: Is My Data Too Dirty?

In the final post in this series about reasons companies think they can’t optimize prices, I’ll address perhaps the most frequently heard concern:  “I have outliers in my transaction data or dirty data.”

Every company has dirty and imperfect data, so welcome to the club. “Garbage In, Garbage Out” is a root fear goes back to the effective use of business intelligence tools. Because these tools typically consume all of your transaction data, they will only be effective if your data is really good. This has led many people to conclude that all data-driven systems are equally sensitive to flaws in the data.

Yet for price optimization, we may only need to look at 70 percent of your transaction rows to get the information we need to set better prices, setting aside that 30 percent which has suspected or known problems. We can do this without compromising our goal because we’re looking for statistical patterns and price signals within the data, not trying to tie-off to totals in your financial systems. For instance, given a sample of 5,000 transactions, I can calculate the average margin rate for a business. If I now randomly remove 1,500 of those transactions from the sample, I will calculate a nearly identical average margin rate – the signal is preserved. The science of price optimization is advanced enough to account for outliers and to remove “suspicious” or bad transactions from the data set.

Don’t sweat dirty data. I’ve never been involved in a project where we said “your data is too messy for us to use, let’s cancel the project.”

Exception Anxiety: Will Sales Reps Follow Price Guidance?

In this series, we are discussing the five most common reasons managers believe they can’t successfully optimize prices. One of the “ah-ha”  moments I see from our customers is around sales reps’ acceptance of price guidance. Initially, many managers believe “sales reps won’t follow the pricing guidance perfectly for all transactions.”

People place too much emphasis on whether sales will strictly follow the pricing guidance from a price optimization project. Sure, there is some change management needed, but that effort should be directed at explaining and demonstrating the benefits, not trying to catch the “violators” or trying to design elaborate systems to prevent any discounting. Even when sales reps have full authority to discount and they disregard the pricing guidance one-third of the time, you are still much better off the remaining two-thirds, than if you had never provided the guidance.

Don’t make the mistake of thinking that when a sales rep deviates from the guidance you’ve had zero influence on the price. In reality it’s quite the opposite. By the very act of putting better price guidance into the systems they already use to quote business today, your reps will attain better prices overall simply because there is something to shoot for, and that something is aligned with market expectations. They might not hit your desired price target every time, but the net effect of aiming for better prices will move your margins in the right direction. It’s always good to measure price achievement and seek to improve it, but it’s definitely not necessary to have 100 percent compliance in order to achieve huge profitability gains.

Exception Anxiety: Can You Perfectly Measure Price Elasticity?

In this series, I’m discussing the five most common reasons companies assume prohibit them from optimizing prices. One of the most important enabling factors for optimization is the ability to measure price elasticity in B2B transactions. Yet, many managers fall into the trap that “I can’t perfectly measure price elasticity.”

Fair enough, but perfection isn’t required. If you are not using price elasticity today and you move into a world where you begin to calculate price elasticity to some reasonable tolerance, that’s a huge step forward in price quality. Some people question whether price elasticity can be accurate enough because they are concerned about noise or known flaws in their data, or the presence of non-price factors that influence buying decisions. I agree that such noise means there is a limit to the accuracy of the price elasticity values. But if I calculate an elasticity of 2.1, do I really care if the exact value is 2.15 or 2.18? No, I don’t. That’s just an argument over the margin of error.

In practical terms, the gains you receive from moving up to elasticity-aware price optimization are so significant, that the cost of using imperfect elasticity values has an inconsequential impact on the overall result. Put another way, if I actually earn $15 million in new profits using elasticity based prices yet theoretically leave $300K of incremental profits on the table because of my margin of error in elasticity, I’m still way ahead.  Price elasticity values aren’t perfect, but they are far better than the guesswork used in most B2B companies today.